Socialist and Secular in the preamble

Socialist and Secular in the preamble


  • The Supreme Court will hear a petition filed by former MP, seeking the removal of the words “socialist” and “secular” from the preamble of the Indian Constitution.

  • The two terms were inserted into the preamble as part of the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution in 1976 during the Emergency.

Key Details

  • The petitioners in two similar cases have argued that these words were never intended to be in the Constitution and that such insertion is “beyond the amending power of the Parliament under Article 368”

    Socialist and Secular in the preamble
    Source: Wikipedia
  • Similar petitions have been filed earlier too and given rise to debates around the preamble and the role it plays in the Constitution.

What is the purpose of the preamble?

  • A preamble serves as an introduction to a document and contains its basic principles and goals.
  • When the Indian Constitution was being drafted, the ideals behind the preamble were first laid down in the Objectives Resolution, adopted by the Constituent Assembly in 1947.
  • These ideals emerged out of the numerous debates that took place during the drafting of the Constitution.

Initially, the Preamble said:

“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.”

Democratic Deliberations

  • The Constitution was the product of democratic deliberations and decided upon by the people of India themselves in the wake of freedom from colonial rule, and the ideals mentioned here were at the core of the newly democratic nation.
  • During the Constituent Assembly debates, many suggestions were put forth — including that God should be invoked in the preamble as in the Irish constitution, that Mahatma Gandhi’s name should be included, etc.
  • The question of whether the preamble is a part of the Constitution or simply an introduction has been deliberated upon by the highest court, because the meaning and weight of the objectives mentioned in it, such as “equality of status and opportunity”, remained unclear from the perspective of law. However, in its judgment in the famous LIC case of 1995, the Supreme Court said, “…and the Preamble of the Constitution which is an integral part and scheme of the Constitution”, affirming its position as part of the Constitution.
  • Additionally, the violation of any principle mentioned in the preamble cannot be a reason to go to court, meaning the preamble is “non-justiciable” — however, judgments of courts can cite it as an additional factor in their reasoning, given that it constitutes the spirit of the Constitution.

Back to Basics

Under what circumstances was the preamble amended?

  • Over her years in government, Indira Gandhi had attempted to cement her approval among the masses on the basis of a socialist and pro-poor image with slogans such as “garibi hatao” (Eradicate poverty). The 42nd Amendment to the Constitution, passed in 1976 when the Emergency was in place, replaced the words “sovereign democratic republic” with “sovereign socialist secular democratic republic”. It also changed “unity of the nation” to “unity and integrity of the nation”.
  • Under Article 368(2), Parliament can amend the Constitution by passing a Bill in “each House by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting”. After that, the Bill “shall be presented to the President who shall give his assent… and thereupon the Constitution shall stand amended”.
  • The 42nd Amendment had several other provisions, by which the Indira government sought to further centralise power. Some of these were reversed by the Janta government that came to power after the Emergency.

Were ‘secular’ and ‘socialist’ debated before Independence?

  • During the debates in the Constituent Assembly, members such as K T Shah and Brajeshwar Prasad had raised the demand to add these words to the preamble.
  • However, Dr B R Ambedkar argued: “What should be the policy of the State, how the Society should be organised in its social and economic side are matters which must be decided by the people themselves according to time and circumstances. It cannot be laid down in the Constitution itself because that is destroying democracy altogether.”

In the petition, the petitioner mentioned Ambedkar’s position.

  • Indeed, many principles affirming secularism and socialism were contained in the Constitution originally, such as in the Directive Principles of State Policy that is meant to guide the government in its actions. Some examples are provisions related to the “equitable distribution of material resources of the community for the common good”, and protecting the rights of workers.
  • Similarly, in the fundamental rights that allow the freedom to profess and propagate one’s religion, as well as in the government policies that recognise religious occasions across communities, an Indian version of secularism is followed. Unlike western secularism which strictly separates the state and religion, the Indian state has over the years acknowledged and involved itself in matters related to all religions.

Source: IE

Visit Abhiyan PEDIA (One of the Most Followed / Recommended) for UPSC Revisions: Click Here

IAS Abhiyan is now on Telegram: Click on the Below link to Join our Channels to stay Updated 

IAS Abhiyan Official: Click Here to Join

For UPSC Mains Value Edition (Facts, Quotes, Best Practices, Case Studies): Click Here to Join

Leave a Reply